Round 2: Less Abstract, More Aggressive
⚠️ Round 1 rejected: too geometric, too minimal. These are BOLD.
A knife cutting through code. Sharp, dangerous, precise. Not a defensive tool — an offensive weapon. The blood drop makes it visceral.
Lock broken, shackle snapped, crack running through. We show the actual moment of breach. The thing every security company fears — we make it our logo.
Crosshair reticle with corner brackets. Target acquired. We're not waiting for attacks — we're actively hunting vulnerabilities. Predator energy.
Green phosphor terminal aesthetic. Command line, glitch art, matrix energy. The hacker's natural habitat. Technical, underground, real.
Snake with fangs dripping venom. Natural predator. Danger from nature, not machines. The threat that evolved to kill. Deadly, patient, precise.
Research lab crest. University seal energy. Traditional institutional authority meets offensive security. The G in a shield. Est. MMXXVI.
1. THE HUNTER (#03) — Crosshair is recognizable, scales well, works in monochrome, communicates "offensive security" instantly. Strong icon potential.
2. TERMINAL (#04) — Most distinctive, owns the hacker aesthetic, impossible to confuse with corporate security. Polarizing = good for differentiation.
3. THE BLADE (#01) — Simple, sharp, aggressive. Works at all sizes. "Surgical precision" narrative is powerful.
Recommendation:
Move forward with THE HUNTER as primary direction. Combine it with TERMINAL aesthetic for marketing materials (green + red color system, glitch effects). Keep BLADE as simplified favicon/icon variant.
All concepts SVG (infinitely scalable).
Round 1 concepts: gallery.html